The Forgotten History of the Drinking Straw: How a Tube of Paper Got Tangled in Modernity

The earliest physical evidence for the drinking straw is a gold tube about 5000 years old, found in a Sumerian tomb near the city of Ur. The tomb belonged to Queen Puabi and contained dozens of luxury objects; the gold tube was originally identified as a scepter or ceremonial object. Subsequent archaeology and reinterpretation has settled on a different reading: it was a straw for drinking beer.

Sumerian beer was made by fermenting partially-ground grain in clay vessels. The grain solids stayed in the vessel rather than being filtered out, which meant the surface of the beer was covered in a layer of floating husks, hops, and fermentation residue. Drinking the beer required getting below the surface layer, which the gold straw accomplished elegantly. The straw was both a functional tool and a luxury object: the queen's beer was approachable via gold, while lower-status drinkers used straws made of reed.

The reed era

For most of the next several thousand years, reed straws were the dominant technology. The Egyptians used them. The Mesoamericans used hollow plant stems for drinking chocolate and atole. Various beer- and porridge-drinking cultures in Africa and Asia used hollow grass stems for the same surface-layer problem the Sumerians had originally addressed.

The reed straw is a remarkably good piece of engineering. It is cheap, biodegradable, hygienic (the cellular structure makes it difficult for bacteria to colonize), and easy to manufacture from naturally available plant material. The main weakness is mechanical: reeds are fragile, do not survive heavy use, and impart a noticeable vegetable flavor to whatever liquid is being drunk.

The vegetable flavor was the issue that drove the next significant innovation, three thousand years after Puabi was buried. In the late nineteenth century, rye-grass straws were the standard tool for drinking iced beverages in the United States. Mint juleps and iced tea were widely consumed, and the iced beverage required a straw because the ice made the drink too cold to be comfortable on the lips. The rye-grass straws gave the iced drinks a faint grassy flavor that bartenders and customers complained about.

Marvin Stone and the paper straw

In 1888, Marvin C. Stone was an inventor and small-scale manufacturer in Washington, DC. He had previously patented a paper cigarette holder and was producing them at a small factory. The cigarette-holder design used paper wrapped around a wooden rod to produce a hollow tube; the paper was then coated with paraffin to keep it from collapsing when wet.

Stone applied the cigarette-holder technique to drinking straws. He wrapped strips of manila paper around a pencil-shaped rod, glued the layers together with adhesive, removed the rod, and coated the finished tube with paraffin wax. The result was a hollow paper tube that was strong enough to drink through, did not impart vegetable flavor, did not deform under moderate heat, and could be produced in long lengths for cents per unit.

Stone received US Patent 375,962 in January 1888. By 1890, his factory was producing more paper straws than rye-grass straws in the American market. By 1900, paper straws had essentially displaced rye-grass straws in commercial use, and the displacement was complete by 1910. The paper straw became the dominant drinking-straw technology for the next half century.

The plastic interlude

The polystyrene drinking straw was developed in the 1930s and 1940s, but it did not become commercially dominant until the 1950s. The post-war American beverage industry expanded rapidly: fast-food restaurants proliferated, convenience-store beverage sales grew, and the volume of disposable drinkware increased by orders of magnitude. Paper straws had a particular weakness in the new high-volume environment: they got soggy. A paper straw in an ice-cold drink stayed structurally sound for ten or fifteen minutes; after that, the paper softened and the straw collapsed.

The polystyrene straw solved the softening problem. It was rigid, did not collapse, did not impart flavor, was cheaper than paper at scale, and could be produced in colors and sizes that paper could not match. By 1970, plastic straws had displaced paper straws in essentially all commercial drinkware use. Paper straws survived in some specialty applications (food-service paper-tube wrappers, novelty packaging) but were essentially extinct as everyday objects.

The McDonald's hamburger and Coca-Cola served at the speed of the 1960s expansion came with a plastic straw. The straw was so closely associated with the modern fast-food experience that the visual was a stand-in for the experience itself: a paper cup, a plastic lid, a plastic straw. Tens of billions of straws were used per year in the United States by 1980.

The contemporary reaction

The contemporary plastic-straw debate started in the 2010s with two specific catalysts. The first was the rise of marine plastic pollution as a public concern, particularly the 2015 video of a sea turtle with a plastic straw embedded in its nostril that circulated on social media. The second was research showing that single-use plastic straws were a significant contributor to coastal plastic pollution in absolute terms, even though they are a small fraction of total plastic waste.

The reaction has been geographically uneven. The European Union banned single-use plastic straws in 2021. California, Washington, New York, and several other US states have implemented bans or fees. Major fast-food chains have voluntarily transitioned to paper or compostable alternatives in many markets. China and India have not yet adopted equivalent restrictions.

The paper-straw revival has produced a substantial industry that is structurally different from Marvin Stone's 1888 factory. Modern paper straws are produced in much higher volumes, with food-grade adhesives, and with bio-based coatings rather than paraffin. They are also more expensive than plastic straws by a factor of 3-5x, which is small in absolute terms but large enough to drive resistance from cost-conscious operators.

The compostable-plastic alternatives (PLA, PHA) have grown alongside the paper revival. These straws have the rigidity of plastic but are designed to biodegrade in industrial composting facilities. The actual biodegradation behavior depends on the composting infrastructure, which is not universally available, and the marketing claims have sometimes outrun the engineering reality.

Three observations

The first observation is that the drinking straw is a 5000-year continuous technology. The Sumerian gold tube and the modern paper straw are recognizably the same object, with the same function, addressing the same problem. The intermediate materials (reed, glass, gold, paper, plastic, paper again) have changed several times, but the basic engineering problem has not changed: provide a hollow tube that lets a drinker get below the surface of a liquid.

The second observation is that the choice of material has been driven by available manufacturing technology at each historical stage, not by abstract optimization. The Sumerians used gold and reed because gold was high-status and reed was cheap. Marvin Stone used paper because his existing factory was set up for paper-tube production. The plastic industry used polystyrene because polystyrene became cheap in the post-war chemical industry. The contemporary paper-straw revival uses paper because paper-tube manufacturing is mature and the alternatives have environmental costs.

The third observation is that what looks like progress is sometimes regress in disguise. The plastic straw was a clear improvement over the paper straw on every dimension except environmental cost: rigidity, cost, color, manufacturing speed. The environmental cost was not visible at the moment of introduction and only became visible decades later. The paper-straw revival is, from a 1950s perspective, a step backwards. From a 2020s perspective, it is a correction to a previously-unrecognized externality.

The deeper observation is that objects we treat as obvious are usually the products of long chains of specific decisions, accidents, and trade-offs. The plastic drinking straw was not inevitable; the paper straw was not displaced because plastic was intrinsically superior; the contemporary debate is not about the abstract right answer but about which set of trade-offs we prefer at the current moment. The 5000-year continuity of the drinking-straw function obscures the contingency of the specific objects we use.

Read more essays and technical writing at anethoth.com — a notebook on databases, distributed systems, biology, and the engineering that holds the world together.