On the Western Front in 1916, British artillery officers coordinating bombardments faced a problem that had no good solution. They needed to synchronize fire to the second. A pocket watch required two hands—one to hold it, one to wind or open the case—which meant stopping whatever else you were doing. Some officers began strapping their pocket watches to leather cuffs cut from equipment straps, holding the watch face up on their wrist.
This improvisation is one of the better-documented inflection points in the history of everyday objects. Before 1914, wristwatches existed but occupied a specific cultural position: they were women's decorative jewelry. Elaborate, jeweled, impractical for serious timekeeping. No self-respecting man in the Victorian or Edwardian era would wear one. The pocket watch, on a chain, was the established form. What the Western Front did was collapse fifty years of cultural resistance into roughly four years of operational necessity.
Before the War: A Gendered Technology
The wristwatch as a concept dates to the 1880s. Patek Philippe and other Swiss houses produced them as ladies' accessories—small, decorative, worn on the wrist like a bracelet. The movements were poor. The cases were not designed for the knocks of daily use. They were considered trinkets. The Illustrated London News ran pieces in the 1890s describing wrist watches as fashionable but impractical novelties for women.
The Boer War (1899–1902) produced early evidence of military interest. Officers in the field, operating over larger distances than any previous British campaign, needed synchronized time signals across units. Some wore "wristlets"—pocket watch movements fitted into small wrist cases. These were not mass-produced. They were individual solutions to an individual problem.
Santos-Dumont and the Aviation Demand Signal
In 1904, Brazilian aviator Alberto Santos-Dumont approached Louis Cartier with a specific complaint: he needed to time his flights with both hands on the controls. Cartier produced a rectangular wristwatch for him—the Santos, still in production today. This established something important: wristwatches could be a serious tool rather than a decorative accessory, at least in contexts where both hands were occupied. Aviation created the same demand that artillery would later make mainstream.
The War as Adoption Accelerator
Between 1914 and 1918, the British Army issued or approved mass-produced wristwatches to officers and eventually enlisted men. The operational logic was straightforward: coordinating attacks required synchronized timing, and a soldier in a trench could not reliably consult a pocket watch. The wrist watch—by this point, the compound word was beginning to separate from "wristlet watch"—became standard kit.
The scale of wartime production mattered. Swiss manufacturers retooled for military-specification movements. English importers who had previously handled small luxury volumes processed war department orders measured in tens of thousands. The supply chain built for military watches was ready to pivot to civilian production in 1919, with trained watchmakers, established import channels, and an enormous cohort of returning soldiers who had spent years wearing the things.
The Reliability Objection and the Oyster Case
The civilian market in the early 1920s was mixed. Men who had worn wristwatches in the war were comfortable with them. Men who hadn't were skeptical on both cultural and practical grounds. The practical objection was real: early wristwatch movements were more exposed to moisture and dust than pocket watches. They broke more often. The cultural objection (effeminate, impractical) was reinforced by the mechanical objection.
Hans Wilsdorf at Rolex solved the mechanical problem in 1926 with the Oyster—the first waterproof wristwatch case, sealed with a screw-down crown. This was not a minor refinement. It directly addressed the durability complaint that was keeping skeptics away. Wilsdorf immediately had swimmer Mercedes Gleitze wear the Oyster during her English Channel crossing in 1927 and published the results. The watch survived. The civilian market began moving decisively toward wristwatches in the late 1920s.
The Pocket Watch Collapse
Pocket watch manufacturing fell dramatically through the 1930s. Established Swiss houses that had produced pocket watches for a century shifted production. American manufacturers like Waltham and Elgin, which had built enormous factories on pocket watch volume, struggled to adapt. Within fifteen years of the WWI armistice, the pocket watch had gone from the default instrument of civilian timekeeping to a niche product for older men and formal dress.
The speed of this collapse is worth noting. The technology of the wristwatch was not better in any fundamental sense—it was simply more convenient for how people actually moved through their days. Cultural resistance that seemed solid in 1910 evaporated within a generation once the military had demonstrated the form at scale and once a solution to the durability problem existed.
The Quartz Interruption
The wristwatch form stabilized in the 1920s and remained essentially unchanged for half a century. Movements improved. Water resistance increased. Automatic winding became widespread. But the case shape, the wrist-mounted form, the crown position—all fixed. Then in 1969, Seiko shipped the Astron, the first commercial quartz wristwatch, accurate to five seconds per day versus the sixty-plus seconds of a good mechanical movement. The Quartz Crisis that followed (1969–1983) destroyed the Swiss mechanical watch industry's volume business. Employment in Swiss watchmaking fell from roughly 90,000 to 30,000.
The recovery came through positioning: Nicolas Hayek built Swatch Group on the insight that a mechanical watch could be a cultural object rather than a timekeeping instrument. The Swatch itself was a cheap quartz product. The prestige brands—Omega, Longines, Breguet—were repositioned as luxury goods where accuracy was beside the point. The form survived by becoming deliberately anachronistic.
Three Observations
War collapsed decades of cultural resistance in years. The pocket watch's social meaning—masculine, serious, correct—was stable enough that no peacetime marketing campaign was going to move it in a single generation. The Western Front did what marketing couldn't. This pattern recurs: aviation safety equipment, synthetic rubber, microwave ovens, the internet—technologies that needed extreme operational pressure to achieve rapid civilian adoption.
The gendered reversal is worth holding separately. A technology categorized as women's jewelry in 1900 became a marker of masculine military competence by 1920. The object didn't change. The context did. What the culture reads into a form is contingent on who was using it last and under what conditions.
The wristwatch form factor has been stable since the 1920s. Everything since has been movement technology, materials, and water resistance. The shape of the problem was solved once and not revisited. This is common with objects that find their optimal form early: the safety pin, the ball bearing, the bottle cap, the zipper—all solved once, then refined without fundamental redesign. The interesting engineering happened at the beginning.
---